Nanotube composites – deja vu all over again?

Carbon nanotubes are, in principle, about the strongest and stiffest materials we know about. The obvious way to exploit the strength and stiffness of fibrous materials like nanotubes is to use them to make a composite material, like the carbon fibre composites that are currently some of the strongest and lightest materials available for advanced applications like the aerospace industry. But the development of nanotube composites has been disappointingly slow. To quote from a recent review in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science (subscription required) – Carbon nanotube polymer composites – by Andrews and Weisenberger (University of Kentucky), “after nearly a decade of research, their potential as reinforcement for polymers has not been fully realized; the mechanical properties of derived composites have fallen short of predicted values”. One of the major problems has been the tendency of nanotubes to agrregate in bundles – for a composite to work well, the reinforcing fibres need to be evenly distributed through the matrix material.

My friend and colleague from Cambridge, Athene Donald, reminds us that we’ve been here before. In an opinion piece (PDF) in the May issue of Nano Today, she recalls the enthusiasm in the early ’80s for so-called molecular composites. The idea was to take the strong, rigid polymers that were being developed at the time (of which Kevlar is the most famous), and make a composite in which dispersed, individual molecules of the rigid polymer played the role of the fibre reinforcement. Despite the expenditure of large sums of money, notably by the US Air Force, this idea didn’t go anywhere, because the forces that make rod-like molecules tend to want to bunch together are very strong and very difficult to overcome. It’s exactly the same physics that’s making it so hard to make good nanotube based composites.

Athene’s piece is about self-assembly. When so many people (including me) are writing about the huge potential for the use of self-assembly as a scalable manufacturing method in nanotechnology, it’s salutory to remember that the tendency to self-assemble can have unwelcome, as well as beneficial, effects. Matter doesn’t always do what you want it to do, particularly at the nanoscale.

One year of Soft Machines

It’s just over a year since I became the proud owner of the domain softmachines.org and managed a basic WordPress installation. At the time I thought to myself “I’ll just get this working, and then make it pretty later”, but of course I never actually got around to much in the way of cosmetic improvement. Let me say to the various people who have emailed me with very sensible suggestions about how to make the site better, thank you for your input, and I still hope to get around to implementing some of them one day…

Looking back on the expectations I had starting out, it’s clear that things haven’t unfolded the way I planned. I’ve certainly spent much less time than I thought I would talking about my own research. I’ve certainly not filled the blog with details of my day-to-day life (maybe that’s a pity – one of my colleagues, when I announced last year that I was starting a blog, said rather caustically “Good – maybe now your graduate students might have some idea where you are when they try in vain to find you”). I’ve probably spent more time than I anticipated discussing MNT, and issues around public engagement and public acceptance seem to have loomed larger than I would have predicted. But I’m happy that the blog has developed a steadily growing readership of a very worthwhile size, and I am continually surprised at the number of people I meet who say they look at it.

Soft machines site statistics

I have some ideas about how the site might develop next year. One thing I hope to do is increase visual impact of the site by including more images; another long overdue task is to go over the archives and arrange some of the more durable entries in a more logical and accessible way. In terms of the balance of the subject matter (or anything else, for that matter), any suggestions are welcome. Ultimately, though, perhaps the best I can hope for is just to try to follow this fascinating and unpredictable subject in whichever direction the advancing science and unfolding debate takes it.